Search Results for "reckless publication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "reckless publication"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

21 Dec 2023

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Copyright Groundless Threat Suit — Restrains Defendant from Publishing Defamatory Statements Alleging Copyright Infringement. Court holds that Section 60 of Copyright Act, 1957 provides a remedy against groundless threats and that an interim injunction can be granted to restrain such threats pending trial.

13 Dec 2023

The appeal arises from an order dated 21 February 2023 passed by the learned District Judge in Civil Suit No.19 of 2022, whereby the trial court grant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Defamation Proceedings Against Advocate for Publishing Notice of Revocation of Power of Attorney. Publication of a legal notice in newspaper cautioning public not to deal with property based on revoked power of attorney does not constitute defamation under Section 500 IPC as it is a privileged communication made in good faith for protection of client's interest.

7 Jun 2023

The applicant, an advocate, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order dated 04.02.2017 pass...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition to Restrain Media from Telecasting Personal Life Details of Petitioner and Family Members — Right to Privacy Prevails Over Media Freedom in Matrimonial Dispute. The court held that the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution is paramount and the media cannot intrude into the personal life of an individual without consent, especially when the matter is sub judice.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, a Software Engineer by profession working at WIPRO, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Restraining TV Channels from Telecasting Personal Life Details in Right to Privacy Case. Court Held That Right to Privacy Under Article 21 Includes Right to Be Let Alone and Media Cannot Intrude Into Personal Life Without Consent.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Asha K., a software engineer by profession working at WIPRO, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Shareholders for Alleged Scandalous Allegations in Legal Proceedings. Filing of false cases does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes the court or impedes administration of justice under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

31 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC), filed a contempt petition against respondent shareholders Sureshchandra V. Par...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of ONGC Employee Alleging Victimization for Whistleblowing — Promotion Not a Fundamental Right. Employee Failed to Establish Arbitrariness or Mala Fides in Denial of Promotion and Disciplinary Action.

15 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Kuldeep Kumar Sethee, an officer of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), filed a writ petition alleging that he was denied ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition Alleging Scandalizing of Lower Court. Use of Words 'Extraneous Considerations' in Review Application Held Not to Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

20 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Col. Mahendra Pratap Choudhary, filed a criminal contempt petition under Section 15 read with Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts A...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)