Search Results for "re-testing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "re-testing"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Minor Cricketer's Petition Challenging Age Determination Test Report. The court quashed the TW-3 test report and directed BCCI and MCA to consider documentary evidence for age verification.

18 Nov 2015

The petitioner, Master Sagar Prakash Chhabria, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Seeds Act Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Give Notice Under Rule 7(1) of Seeds Rules, 1968 Before Drawing Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

3 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Vishwas Pandhari Khuje, Rajendra Bhikanrao Deshmukh, and Ramdas Dnyandev Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Violation of Statutory Right Under Section 25(4) — Delay in Filing Complaint After Expiry of Shelf Life Deprives Accused of Right to Get Sample Tested from Central Drugs Laboratory.

15 Dec 2025

The petitioners, a pharmaceutical company and its directors/employees, were accused in a criminal complaint filed by the Drug Inspector under the Drug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Seed Company for Delay in Prosecution After Expiry of Seed Shelf Life — Right to Get Sample Tested from Central Seed Laboratory Under Section 16(3) of Seeds Act, 1966 Violated. The court held that the valuable right of the accused under Section 16(3) of the Seeds Act, 1966 to have the sample tested by the Central Seed Laboratory was infringed because the prosecution was filed after the expiry of the shelf life of the seeds, and such infringement vitiates the prosecution.

16 Jan 2015

The applicants, including the Managing Director of Mahyco Seeds Limited (now Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company Limited), the company itself, and a propr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Food Adulteration Case Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial Compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Sufficient When No Prejudice Caused.

23 Jul 2019

The appellant Vijendra was convicted under Section 7(1)/16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated buffalo m...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)