Search Results for "ransom demand"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 364-A, 201 IPC Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Lack of Aggravating Circumstances.

The case arises from the kidnapping and murder of an 11-year-old boy, Yash, on 10 June 2013. The appellant, Santosh Kalwe, was a neighbour residing in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in MCOCA Special Case No.1 of 2006. Accused-Appellants Were Convicted Under Various IPC and MCOCA Sections for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder; Appeals Heard and Disposed by Common Judgment.

The case involved the abduction, ransom demand, and murder of Sagar Sahani, son of businessman Satinder Sahani. On 14 August 2005, Sagar was abducted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused made a demand for ransom; conviction under Section 365 IPC upheld for abduction.

The appellant, Mehtab Alam Lalai Choudhari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 364-A (kidnappi...