Search Results for "protected workman"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "protected workman"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Labour Court Award in Favor of Workman in MSRTC Dismissal Case — 25% Back Wages Granted for Procedural Violation. Dismissal Quashed as Enquiry Officer Was Not Appointed by Competent Authority Under Section 6(6) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2019

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and award dated 4.8.2018 of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Order in Industrial Dispute Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Preliminary Issue. Management's Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Approval of Dismissal Was Pending; Tribunal Erred in Holding Domestic Enquiry Vitiated Without Adjudicating the Application.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. (KFIL), filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

31 Mar 2012

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Repatriation Order in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Transfer from EDP Section to Generation Side Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice as Employee Had No Right to Continue in Particular Post.

12 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Promod Singh Hanuman Singh Parihar, was employed as a Sub-Engineer/Chargeman Grade II in the Generation side of the Maharashtra State ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Employee Without Proper Domestic Inquiry — Violation of Natural Justice and Service Rules. The court held that dismissal without a proper domestic inquiry is invalid and directed reinstatement with back wages.

29 Nov 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Mrs. Vatsala Premchand Sarmal, the petitioner, challenging the dismissal of the First Respondent, Mr. Raghu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

27 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Industrial Dispute As Labour Court Retains Jurisdiction Under Section 33(3) Despite Disposal of Main Reference. Application for Discharge of Protected Workman Must Be Decided on Merits Even After Award of Reference; Section 33(3) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Mandates Adjudication of Pending Applications.

7 Feb 1968

The dispute arose from the respondent State Bank of India's decision to dismiss the appellant P.D. Sharma, a protected workman, during the pendency of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved by Oral and Documentary Evidence. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Lack of Negligence Despite Clear Evidence of Rash Driving and Criminal Conviction.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Santosh Chandrakant Potdar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)