Search Results for "prosecutrix testimony"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "prosecutrix testimony"

287 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 287 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Gang Rape and Dacoity in Sessions Case No.127 of 2012 — Appellants Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Gang Rape Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and Dacoity Under Section 395 IPC. The court held that the victim's testimony, corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of stolen articles, was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

3 Apr 2018

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by four appellants (accused) challenging their conviction and sentence by the Additional Sessions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Rape Allegation.

25 Sep 2012

The appellant, Ravindra Yogiraj Paul, was convicted by the Special Judge (Atrocity Case) for offences under Sections 376, 363, and 506 of the Indian P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage — Consent Obtained on Misconception of Fact Not Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that a mere breach of promise to marry does not constitute rape under Section 375 IPC unless the promise was false from the inception and the accused had no intention to marry at the time of the act.

10 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Anurag Soni, the original accused, against his conviction under Section 376(1) IPC for rape based on a false p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

17 Jul 2019

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(g) IPC and SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

23 Sep 2019

The case involves three appeals against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, in Sessions Case No.50/2012. The appellant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Daughter but Acquits Accused of Murder and Forgery Charges Due to Lack of Evidence. The court confirmed the conviction under Section 376(2)(c) IPC based on the sole testimony of the victim, applying the presumption under Section 114-A of the Evidence Act, 1872.

2 Sep 2014

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 42/2002 decided by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada on 17-01-2012. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Voluntary Accompaniment. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Conduct and Delayed FIR Undermine Allegations Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

19 Aug 2006

The appellant, Rajan Kannan Padiyachi, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.159 of 1997 for offences...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Gang Rape Case — Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the testimony of the minor prosecutrix was trustworthy and sufficient to sustain convictions under Sections 376(g), 366(A), and 363 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

24 Jun 2014

The appellants, Narayan s/o Ashok Ragde and Rahim Shah s/o Bashir Shah, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Aurangabad in Sessions Case...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

22 Sep 2017

The appellant, Zabarsingh Pilya Bhilala, was convicted by the IIIrd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial 80/1997 for offences u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Attempt to Murder in Case of Brutal Sexual Assault by Distant Relative. Life Sentence Confirmed for Offences Under Sections 376, 307, 342, 506 IPC Based on Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence.

16 Jul 2013

The appellant, Sachin Raghunath Fulsundar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 307, 376, 342, and 506 of the Indian...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)