KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "proportionate attachment"
50 result(s) found
Found 50 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.
8 Jul 2026The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal and Release of Deposited Amount in Insolvency Case — Moratorium Under Section 14 IBC Bars Enforcement Against Corporate Debtor's Assets. The cash deposit made by the corporate debtor in court is an asset belonging to the corporate debtor, and the resolution professional is entitled to its release for the resolution process.
13 Nov 2024The Bombay High Court allowed an application filed by the Resolution Professional of Siti Networks Ltd. (corporate debtor) seeking withdrawal of Appea...
- 525
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Parcel Space Lease Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that claimant failed to prove termination of contract and is not entitled to refund of security deposit.
31 Jul 2019The petitioner, Prajapati Gunwant Keshavlal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Petition in Eviction Decree Execution — Division Bench of Small Causes Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Remanding Matter for Proposal to Remove Structure. The decree had attained finality up to the Supreme Court, and the executing court's order directing restoration of vacant possession was proper; the revisional court's interference was unwarranted.
10 Oct 2017The petitioner, Mrs. Vranda G. Pai, is the decree holder in an eviction decree dated 2nd December 2006, which had attained finality up to the Supreme ...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Redevelopment Dispute — Dispute Not Arbitrable Under Section 41(e) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Termination of Development Agreement and Claim for Possession Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration as They Involve Specific Performance and Continuous Duties.
20 Oct 2015The petitioners, Anand Villa Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and ...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.
30 Jul 2013The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...
- 207
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Occupier's Challenge to Deposit Condition in Property Tax Appeal. Section 217(5) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Allows Appellate Court to Impose Deposit Condition Despite Section 209(3) Limitation on Occupier's Liability.
21 Jul 2011The petitioners, Dena Bank and its manager, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 26 March 2...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if Case is Made Out Against Accused.
8 Nov 2006The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dadasaheb Rane, a market inspector of Bicholim Municipal Council (BMC), who was charged with theft ...
- 195
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Official Liquidators' Appeal in Company Winding-Up Rent Claim Dispute. Landlord's Claim for Rent Priority Denied as Proviso to Rule 97 of Company Rules Does Not Grant Precedence Over Other Creditors.
10 Nov 1959The dispute arose out of the winding up of U. P. Union Bank Ltd. The bank was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent landlord. After the windi...
- 28
