Search Results for "profit motive not essential"

154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Joint Venture Taxation Case — Income Taxable Only in Hands of Actual Executor. ITAT's concurrent finding that joint venture did not execute contract and income was already assessed in hands of constituent member upheld.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Nagpur, in res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows University's Revision Petitions in VAT Dispute — Supply of Textbooks and Uniforms to Students Not Taxable as 'Sale'. Educational Institution Providing Essential Items to Students as Part of Education Is Not a Dealer Under KVAT Act, 2003.

The case involves sales tax revision petitions filed by Manipal University under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act). ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Non-Agricultural. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with High Sale Price and Lack of Systematic Cultivation Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had upheld the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Held Not Agricultural Despite Plantation. Sale of Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels at High Price Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Section 2(14) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, husband and wife, who sold their ancestral prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold by Non-Resident Indians Held Not Agricultural Land. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with Barren Nature and High Sale Price Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Section 2(14) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Reference on Difference of Opinion in Municipal Tax Assessment Case. Question of law regarding determination of annual letting value under Section 154 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for premises exempt under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

This judgment is a reference to a third judge following a difference of opinion in an appeal against a Single Judge's decision in a writ petition conc...