Search Results for "presumption under section 20"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. High Court's reversal of conviction for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld as prosecution failed to prove demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the State of Karnataka against the acquittal of the respondent, Chandrasha, by the High Court of Karnataka. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Fakira s/o Magdu Kannake, a Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shriram s/o Timaji Chachane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia in Special Case No. 3/93 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...