Search Results for "presumption under POCSO Act"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses Under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Sundaram, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, for offences under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 452, 376AB, 506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anand S/o Durgappa Gollar, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi in Special Case No.505/2023 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Foundational Facts and Unreliable Evidence. Presumption under Section 29 of POCSO Act cannot be invoked without prosecution first proving foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Vijay Manoharrao Jawanjal under Section 376AB of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the Prot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Raping Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act. Life imprisonment confirmed for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 POCSO Act, but conviction under Section 376d IPC set aside for lack of evidence of gang rape.

The appellant, Mohd. Zakir Habib Khan, was convicted by the Special Court under the POCSO Act for sexually abusing his own daughter from the time she ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Travel Permission for Accused in POCSO Case — Accused Allowed to Travel to US for Ten Months with Cash Security. Special Court's Order Relaxing Bail Conditions Upheld as No Perversity Found; Accused Must Return by 30.06.2020 and Attend Police Station Upon Return.

The petitioner, Maria Kuttubudin Lokhandwala, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 22.08.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5 and 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, under Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...