Search Results for "pre-cognizance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "pre-cognizance"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR and Revisional Order for Violation of Accused's Right to Hearing in Criminal Revision. The court held that Section 401(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 mandates hearing for accused or other persons in revisional proceedings, and Sessions Judge's failure to hear petitioners before allowing revision against dismissal of Section 156(3) application rendered the order and subsequent FIR invalid.

2 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a criminal writ petition filed by two petitioners, a senior citizen and her daughter, seeking to quash an FIR registered agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Invalid Service of Demand Notice. Notice sent by speed post but not delivered to correct address; court holds that service of notice is mandatory under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

12 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Salim s/o Jilani Qureshi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Section 156(3) Order in Stockbroker-Client Dispute. Dispute over share transactions held to be civil, not criminal, under Section 409 IPC.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, Nirmal Bang Securities Private Limited (a stockbroking company) and its directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings in Complaint Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Magistrate's Order Without Application of Mind and 14-Year Delay in Investigation Constitute Abuse of Process, Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

28 Feb 2017

The petitioners, Sayed Anwar Ahmed and Sayed Ghulam Raza Naqvi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Magistrate's Order in Cooperative Bank Directors' Case — Abuse of Process and Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 468, 477A IPC read with Section 34 IPC quashed as the Magistrate ignored the High Court's earlier order restoring the complaint for consideration under Section 202 CrPC, and the directors being public servants required sanction for prosecution.

19 Aug 2013

The applicants, nine directors of a cooperative bank, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking qu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Magistrate's Order Directing Verification Under Section 200 CrPC After Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Pre-Cognizance Investigation Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC Precludes Post-Cognizance Verification Under Section 200 CrPC as Stages Are Mutually Exclusive.

25 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Amish Jayant Dharod, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, 2nd Court,...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)