Search Results for "phenolphthalein test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "phenolphthalein test"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Government Servant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Based on Reliable Trap Evidence. Constable's Conviction for Demanding and Accepting Bribe from Liquor Trader Sustained as Witness Testimonies Were Consistent and Defence Claims Unsubstantiated Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

13 Mar 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal against the High Court of Uttarakhand's judgment dated 13.04.2012, which upheld the Trial Court's c...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Trial Court's Acquittal of Police Constable Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Foundational Facts.

5 Feb 2026

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Ashokbhai Rambhai Der, a police constable, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient without independent corroboration.

8 Jan 2026

The appellant, Zaverilal Ramjibhai Gala, was a Chief Engineer with Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB) and was convicted by the Special Judge (ACB), Kutch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Trustworthy Evidence and Applicable Presumption. The Court Held That Minor Discrepancies in Witness Testimony Do Not Vitiate Prosecution When Core Facts of Demand and Acceptance Are Established Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) Read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Apr 2025

The present criminal appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 09.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Dharwad in Crimin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

1 Jan 2025

The appellant, P. Somaraju, was an Assistant Commissioner of Labour in Hyderabad. The complainant, S. Venkat Reddy (PW-1), a licensed labour contracto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

5 Jul 2024

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Revenue Inspector and Middleman Challenged Trial Court's Conviction for Demanding and Accepting Bribe for Change of Khata, Alleging Invalid Sanction and Procedural Errors.

28 Sep 2021

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and sentence by the Special Court in Spl. Case No.679/2011 dated 13.06.2013, convicting the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

11 Aug 2020

The appellant, C. Krishnaiah, was accused no. 2 in a corruption case before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

21 Jun 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Prabhakar Uddarwar, who was a Nazul Surveyor in the office of Taluka Inspec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

29 Apr 2015

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)