Search Results for "partner liability"

375 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 375 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Partnership Investment — Complaint Not Maintainable Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Complainant Was a Partner and Transaction Was Commercial. Partner Cannot Be a Consumer; Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner Not Liable in Consumer Forum.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the legal heirs of a deceased partner against the concurrent orders of the consumer fora directing them ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partner's Challenge to Prosecution Under Section 138 NI Act Without Joining Firm. Partnership Firm Not a Separate Legal Entity; Partner Can Be Prosecuted Individually for Cheque Dishonour.

The case involves four criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioner, Philip J., challenging the order dated 23 July 2013 passed by the Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Prosecution Under Section 138 NI Act Against Partner Without Joining Firm. Partner Can Be Prosecuted Individually as Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 NI Act Extends to Every Person in Charge of Business.

The Bombay High Court decided four criminal writ petitions involving the same parties and a common question of law: whether a prosecution under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Matter — Full Back Wages Awarded for Flawed Inquiry. Syndicate Bank's Dismissal of Clerk for Alleged Misconduct Set Aside as Inquiry Was Vitiated by Bias and Non-Supply of Documents.

The petitioner, Syndicate Bank, a nationalised bank, challenged the Part-I Award dated 28.5.2003 and Part-II Award dated 7.9.2010 passed by the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant Partner. Failure to Prove Legal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, against the acquittal of Laxman Vithal Chunek...