WRIT PETITION NO. 116 OF 2025
23 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "panchayat raj"
464 result(s) found
Found 464 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Panchayat Order for Demolition of Toilet Constructed on Common Well. Construction of Toilet and Septic Tank on a Common Well Without Permission Violates Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Public Health Norms.
18 Oct 2023The petitioner, Milagrina D'Mello, and the first respondent, John Gonsalves, are neighbours sharing a common well on the boundary of their properties....
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.
3 May 2023The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Executive Officer's Appellate Order in Grama Panchayat Property Dispute — Khata Change Directed Based on Possession and Revenue Records. The Court held that the Grama Panchayat cannot refuse khata change when the applicant is in possession and has valid revenue entries, and the Executive Officer's appellate order under Section 269 of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is binding.
30 Aug 2021The dispute pertains to property bearing Khata No.160 measuring East-West 150 feet and North-South 100 feet situated in K.R.Sagara, Belagola Hobli, Sr...
- 179
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Panchayat Election Schedule During COVID-19 Pandemic — State Election Commission's Power to Conduct Elections Under Article 243K and Goa Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Upheld. The court held that the election schedule was not arbitrary and that the Commission had taken adequate safety measures, dismissing petitions challenging the schedule.
11 Dec 2020The petitioners, who were candidates or intending candidates for the Goa Panchayat elections, challenged the election schedule notified by the Goa Sta...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 in Public Interest Litigation. Sections 10-17, 33-37, and 39 of the Act are not unconstitutional as they provide for public participation and do not delegate essential legislative functions.
12 Feb 2020The petitioner, The United Goans Foundation, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Declaring Ujani as Grama Panchayat Headquarter, Dispute Over Location Between Ujani and Gudapalli Under Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Single Judge had set aside Regional Commissioner's decision favoring Gudapalli, and the division bench heard arguments on the scope of judicial review over administrative headquarter fixation.
27 Feb 2019The appeal arose from a dispute regarding the location of the headquarter of a newly constituted grama panchayat comprising four villages: Ujani, Medp...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.
8 Feb 2019The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.
8 Feb 2019The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...
- 38
