Search Results for "ossification test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "ossification test"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Juvenile Status Determination in Death Penalty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Delays. Applicant Failed to Prove Juvenility Under Section 9(2) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, with Discrepancies in Name and Age Documents and Belated Claim After Conviction Confirmation.

27 Mar 2023

The case involved an application under Section 9(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, filed by a convict sentenced ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 2023

The appellant, P. Yuvaprakash, was convicted by the trial court and the Madras High Court for offenses under Section 366A IPC and Section 6 of the POC...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder but Remits Sentence to Juvenile Board — Appellant Found to Be Juvenile on Date of Offence Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. The court accepted the finding that the appellant was a juvenile on the date of the offence based on ossification test and Rule 12(3)(b) of the Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007, and directed the matter to be placed before the Juvenile Justice Board for sentence.

22 Mar 2011

The appellant, Chhotu @ Asif Istraeel Shaikh, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Sessions Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

27 Mar 2018

The appellant, Prashant Korwate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC read with Section 3 punishable ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Children's Court Finding on Juvenile Age Determination in Criminal Appeal — Ossification Test and School Records Considered. The court held that the ossification test indicating age 18-20 years and unreliable school records supported the finding that the appellant was about 18 years on the date of offence under Section 2(k) and (l) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

6 Apr 2011

The appellant, Raju Pasla, was convicted by the trial court and filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa. During the appeal, he cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Minor Cricketer's Petition Challenging Age Determination Test Report. The court quashed the TW-3 test report and directed BCCI and MCA to consider documentary evidence for age verification.

18 Nov 2015

The petitioner, Master Sagar Prakash Chhabria, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Sections 376 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

22 Dec 2018

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of acquittal dated 24 July...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Teacher for Rape of Minor Student — Sentence of 10 Years RI Maintained. Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence of Pregnancy and Delivery.

7 Jul 2014

The appellant, Sayyed Khalil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for offences under Sections 376(1) and 506 of the Indian Penal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Consent and Promise of Marriage — Failure to Prove Ingredients of Rape Under Section 375 IPC. Evidence of Victim Contradictory and Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Prosecution Story.

4 Jun 2018

The applicant, Pravin @ Shrikrishna Chandrakant Marathe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for offences under Sections 376, 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), 5(l) of POCSO Act and Sections 376, 417 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's age not proven beyond reasonable doubt and relationship was consensual.

21 Oct 2016

The appellant, Kundan Pendor, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), and 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)