Search Results for "oppression"

174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CLB Order for Sealed Bids in Shareholding Dispute Under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956. Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB's Direction for Sealed Bids to Resolve Oppression and Mismanagement Allegations in Vidarbha Bottlers Private Limited.

The case involves a company appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 7 August 2012. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Consent Order in Company Oppression Case — Parties Bound by Consensus. Consent order for share buyout under Sections 397-398 of Companies Act, 1956 cannot be challenged by consenting party.

The case involves an appeal filed by Shalby Limited and others against an order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB), New Delhi Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Protection in Oppression and Mismanagement Petition Under Companies Act, 2013. Court Extended Restraint on Construction and Permitted Limited Protective Works to Preserve Subject Matter of Dispute Pending Adjudication by NCLT.

The dispute arose from a company petition filed by the appellants under Sections 241, 242, 244, and 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging oppression...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Examination of Share Dispute in Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Supreme Court overturns NCLT and NCLAT rulings, directing a re-examination of evidence in share transfer and oppression claims.

Legal Background: The appellants sought rectification of the Register of Members of Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd. under Sections 59 and 88 of the Co...