Search Results for "non-resident"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Share Issue Expenses to Dilute Foreign Equity as Capital Expenditure Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Interest on Share Application Money Cannot Be Adjusted Against Such Capital Expenditure.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) at the ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Debenture Trustee in Recovery Suit Against Corporate Guarantor. Defendant's Triable Issues Found to be Sham and Moonshine, Entitling Plaintiff to Judgment Under Order 37 CPC.

The plaintiff, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Hubtow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Summary Suits Dismissed for Want of Prosecution, Imposing Costs for Non-Compliance with Directions. Non-Resident Indian Plaintiffs' Explanation of Travel Commitments Accepted as Sufficient Cause for Restoration.

The plaintiffs, Nakul Arun Jagjivan and Nayan Arun Jagjivan, filed summary suits against Ram V. Tyagrajan and another defendant, claiming recovery of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Royalty and Advance Tax Case — Payments for Equipment and Spare Parts Not Taxable as Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Advance Tax Liability When Entire Income Subject to TDS.

The Revenue filed five appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reimbursement of Expenses Disclosed in Return and Application Under Section 195(2) Sought, No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Monitor India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of a Dutch company, challenged a notice dated 22 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Inco...