Search Results for "non-deposit"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act When Physical Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, as Per Overruled Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail Without Deposit Condition in Section 420 IPC Case. Indefeasible Right Under Section 167(2) CrPC Cannot Be Subject to Monetary Conditions Based on Earlier Regular Bail Undertaking.

The appellant was arrested on 31.01.2020 for offences under Section 420 IPC in Crime No.31 of 2019. He was initially granted regular bail by the Magis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Odisha Forest Development Corporation Ltd. in Tender Dispute — Refund of Deposit Ordered by High Court Set Aside. Forfeiture of Security Deposit Upheld as Per Contract Terms When Writ Petition Withdrawn Without Pressing Challenge.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the High Court of Orissa. The appellant, Odisha Forest Development Corporat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Tenant Purchaser in Deity Land Sale Dispute. Upholds Sale to Tenant Despite Higher Offer from Intervenors, Holding That Registered Sale Deeds Cannot Be Ignored and Tenancy Status Was Not Challenged.

The case involves a dispute over the sale of land belonging to the deity Sri Rama Laxman Sita Swamy Bije, managed by a fit person. The fit person soug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302/34 IPC — High Court's Alteration of Charge from Section 302/149 to Section 302/34 Upheld

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Phuman Singh and Kashmiro, upholding their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to MRT Order on Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings. Earlier Dismissal for Default Does Not Bar Subsequent Proceedings Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Ashish Chandrasingh Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 2nd November, 2018 passed ...