Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Compulsory Service Bonds of ESIC Medical Students; Questions Validity Under ESI Act and Constitution
6 Apr 2026...
Search Results for "negative lien"
58 result(s) found
Found 58 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal by State Bank of India Against Single Judge Order Directing Release of Title Deeds, Holding That Bank Has a Lien Over Deposited Title Deeds Under Section 171 of the Contract Act, 1872, and That the Borrowers Must Repay the Loan Before Seeking Return of Documents.
4 Apr 2025The case involves a writ appeal filed by the State Bank of India (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge dated 20.06.2024 in W.P.No.201339/202...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Inventory Proceedings Under Portuguese Civil Procedure Code Regarding Heritability of Auction Rights. The court held that rights from a successful bid in licitation are heritable under Article 1737 of the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code, 1867, as they are not personal, and the obligation to deposit arises only after final partition, allowing heirs to claim the property.
19 Sep 2022The dispute originated from inventory proceedings under the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code, initiated in 1985 for the partition of the estate of Lt. ...
- 268
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bond Redemption Dispute, Upholding Defendant's Compliance with RBI Directives. Interest on Delayed Payment Not Payable Due to Regulatory Embargo and Pending Liquidation Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.
3 Jan 2022The dispute arose from a suit filed by M/s. SIBCO Investment Pvt Ltd against Small Industries Development Bank of India seeking interest on alleged be...
- 378
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defendants in Property Dispute — Holds That Plaintif Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Restraining Sale of Flat. Court finds that the agreement for sale was not a concluded contract and the plaintif's claim for specifc performance was not maintainable.
18 Mar 2021The present appeal arises from an interim order dated 28 January 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in Interim Application (L) No. 196 of 2021 in...
- 47
High Court
Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.
31 Jan 2019The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...
- 103
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Decides Revenue's Wealth Tax Appeals Involving Definition of 'Assets'. The Appeals Challenge ITAT Orders Regarding Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2004-05 under Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.
30 Aug 2018The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of Wealth Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, against the order...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.
29 Oct 2013The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Port Trust's Claim for Demurrage Prior to Confiscation Order: Suit Not Barred by Limitation. Right to Sue Accrues on Date of Confiscation Under Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963, and Not at Expiry of Free Days Despite Board's Powers Under Sections 61 and 62 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.
15 Dec 2006This is a suit filed by the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay against an importer for recovery of port trust charges (wharfage and demurrage) ac...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.
1 Jan 1970The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...
