Search Results for "msedcl"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Injunction Dispute Over Land Access. High Court sets aside lower courts' orders rejecting temporary injunction, finding that the Plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience for restraining Defendants from interfering with its right of way.

The Petitioner, Mondelez India Foods Private Limited (formerly Cadbury India Company Ltd), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CGRF Clarification Order for Lack of Jurisdiction — Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Cannot Review or Clarify Its Own Orders Under Electricity Act, 2003. CGRF's Order Directing MSEDCL to Refund Excess FAC Installments Set Aside as Without Authority of Law.

The Bombay High Court considered a writ petition filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Electricity Distribution Company Against Quashing of Captive Power Plant Circulars. MERC's Retrospective Quashing of Pre-Approval Circulars Without Considering Financial Impact Set Aside.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) against an order of the Appellate Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 155 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that prosecution under Section 135 cannot proceed without a complaint by an authorized officer as mandated by Section 155.

The applicant, Sou. Vimal w/o. Murlidharrao Suradkar, filed a criminal application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Conviction under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dishonest abstraction of energy beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, in Special Case (Elec.) No.11 of 2...