Search Results for "model employer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "model employer"

339 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 339 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Award Denying Subsistence Allowance for Failure to Mark Attendance During Suspension. Suspended Employee Not Required to Attend Factory Daily for Subsistence Allowance Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

3 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Level Employees Union, challenged an Award dated 13.08.2014 which rejected a Reference concerning denial of subsistence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workers' Appeal in Contract Labour Dispute — IPCA Laboratories Held Liable as Principal Employer Under Contract Labour Act. The court held that the Labour Enforcement Officer's complaint under Section 22A of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was maintainable and that the company was the principal employer, rejecting the company's challenge to the cognizance order.

23 Nov 2022

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a common order in Writ Petition No. 2791 of 2009. The appellants in LPA No. 270 of 2009 are ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld for Workmen Found to Have Completed 240 Days of Service and Terminated Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Jun 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Duncan Engineering Ltd. (erstwhile Schrader Duncan Ltd.) challenging separate awards passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders in Service Disputes — Interim Relief Granted Subject to Compliance with Section 17B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that while the Industrial Court has jurisdiction to grant interim relief, such relief must be based on prima facie findings and cannot be granted mechanically without considering the employer's objections.

27 Nov 2020

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. challenging orders of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which granted interi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

21 Feb 2011

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Air India, Upholds Dismissal of Air Hostess for Unauthorized Absence After Maternity Leave. The court held that the Industrial Tribunal's order of reinstatement was perverse and that the employer's decision to dismiss was justified under the Model Standing Orders.

16 Sep 2010

The litigation between Air India Limited (appellant) and Ms. Shashikala Jatav (respondent) has been ongoing for two decades. The respondent was employ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Approval Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Granted for Acts of Violence on Establishment Premises. The court found no perversity in the Industrial Tribunal's decision to grant approval for dismissal based on chargesheets and a subsequent incident of violence.

28 Sep 2006

This batch of six writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arises from orders of the Industrial Tribunal granting approval under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 77 Employees Seeking Permanency Against Nagpur Municipal Corporation — Seasonal Workers Not Entitled to Automatic Permanent Status Under Model Standing Orders. The Court held that the burden of proving continuous service of 240 days in the preceding year was not discharged and the employer's classification of workers as seasonal was not arbitrary.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioners, 77 employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.12.1994 of the Industrial Cour...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)