Search Results for "mismatch"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Release of Academic Documents to Law Graduate in Manav Bharti University Case -- Student's Career Prejudice Addressed Despite University's Record Discrepancies

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by Pratima Das, a law graduate from Manav Bharti University, seeking release of her academic documents. The Appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Adultery Based on DNA Test Excluding Paternity. DNA test report conclusively proved that the husband was not the biological father of the child born to the wife, establishing adultery under Section 13(1)(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-husband Gajanan Deshpande filed a divorce petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging that his wife Smita Deshpande committed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release from Investor Protection Fund Due to Client Code Mismatch. Claim Rejected as Contract Notes Did Not Match Trade Files of Stock Exchange.

The petitioner, Saurin T. Parikh, proprietor of Shah Investment, filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 25th May 2005 passed by the...