Search Results for "mis-statement"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand in Karnataka Appellate Tribunal Order for Lack of Notice and Limitation — Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Sections 45-A and 46-A Demand Set Aside as Time-Barred and Violative of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Sri B C Prasad and Sri Guru Prasad, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Authority in Plot Allotment Case Due to False Affidavits and Breach of Eligibility Conditions. Allotment Cancelled as Plaintiff and Spouse Filed False Affidavits Concealing Prior Allotment, Violating Terms Under Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Act, 1976.

The dispute arose from the allotment of residential plots in Noida. The plaintiff-respondent, a member of the Defence Services Cooperative Housing Soc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Penalty and Confiscation. Import of Vessels for Offshore Exploration Not Liable to Penalty Under Customs Act for Alleged Misdeclaration of Value.

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against a common order dated 14th August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...