Search Results for "minority shareholders"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Monarch Research and Brokerage Private Limited and Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited with Networth Stock Broking Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — Objection by Gold Castle Realtor Dismissed as Not a Creditor or Member.

The judgment concerns two Company Scheme Petitions (CSP 575/2012 and CSP 576/2012) filed by Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited (2nd Transferor Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Shareholder Suit Challenging Director Appointments for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dispute Over Rights Under Articles of Association Falls Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of Company Law Board Under Companies Act, 1956.

The suit was filed by shareholders of a banking company, Yes Bank, challenging resolutions relating to the appointment of directors and seeking declar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Derivative Action Suit for Lack of Prima Facie Case and Delay. Minority shareholders failed to establish bonafide action or balance of convenience for interim relief against majority shareholders.

The appellants, Victor Fernandes and others, were minority shareholders in eEighteen.com Limited (defendant No.3), holding about 6.38% equity, while d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Cheating Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court finds that the investigating officer failed to examine crucial documents and witnesses, rendering the summary report premature and based on incomplete investigation.

The petitioner, Dharmil Anil Bodani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Crim...