Search Results for "ministerial role"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "ministerial role"

93 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Registration of Partnership Firm Under Section 58 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 — Mandamus Issued for Consideration of Representation. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation for registration of their partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 and the Karnataka Partnership (Regulation of Firms) Rules, 1954, without expressing any opinion on merits.

25 Apr 2026

The petitioners, including M/S Spectrum Space Infra, Dinero Trust, Enas Trust, and SMS Software Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles ...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Sub-Registrar for Recording Cancellation of Registered Documents - Sub-Registrar's Refusal to Act on Civil Court Decree Quashed as Arbitrary and Contrary to Statutory Duty. Court Held Registering Authority's Function is Ministerial Under Section 31(2) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Rule 123 of Karnataka Registration Rules, 1965, and Certified Copy of Decree is Conclusive Proof Requiring Implementation Without Insisting on Formal Court Communication.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a property development arrangement where the petitioner, claiming absolute ownership of the suit schedule property, execut...

High Court

Madras High Court Sets Aside Rejection of Plaint at SR Stage for Limitation — Directs Numbering Without Prejudice to Limitation Defence. The court held that the role of the trial court at the institution stage is ministerial, not judicial, and limitation is a mixed question of fact and law to be decided after trial or under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

30 Jan 2026

The revision petitioner, D. Mohanraj, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Challenge to District Magistrate's Order Appointing Tehsildar for Possession in Cooperative Society Recovery. The Court held that the District Magistrate's power under Rule 107(11)(d-1)(vi) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 is ministerial and does not require a hearing to the borrower.

4 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Amit Prakash Jori and Jyoti Prakash Jori, were borrowers who had taken a loan of Rs.30 lakh from respondent No.2, Dyandeep Co-op. Cre...

High Court

Upholding Procedural Validity in SARFAESI Proceedings. "Reaffirming the ministerial role of courts under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act."

13 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court, examined procedural aspects under the SARFAESI Act concerning the non-compliance with the requirements of Section 13(2) and Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

30 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Letters of Administration in Will Dispute Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Proof of Due Execution. Will propounded by sons from second wife held not proved as last Will of deceased Vithal Gunduji Rananavare.

16 Jun 2023

The present Testamentary Suit was filed by Dr. Ravindra alias Satish Vithal Rananavare (since deceased) and Devendra alias Sanju Vithal Rananavare, so...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

10 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Assumes Suo Motu Jurisdiction to Address COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services. The Court directed the Union of India to report on coordination, allocation, and management of oxygen, essential drugs, vaccination, and medical infrastructure under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, emphasizing a bounded-deliberative approach without usurping executive roles.

30 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India initiated a suo motu writ petition in response to the unprecedented humanitarian crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Pharmacy Council of India's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Pharmacy Education, Overriding AICTE. The Pharmacy Act, 1948 is a complete code, and the word 'pharmacy' in Section 2(g) of the AICTE Act must be read down to exclude AICTE's regulatory power.

5 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of cases concerning the regulatory authority over pharmacy education in India. The dispute arose when the Pharma...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)