Search Results for "ministerial interference"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal under Section 91 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 against Registrar's order permitting delayed evidence affidavit

The Bombay High Court heard an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 against an order of the Registrar of Trade Marks allowing a delaye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging LIC Amendment Rules 2016, Holds No Infringement of Promotional Rights. Court Rules That Development Officers Retain Promotion to Assistant Branch Manager, Equivalent to Assistant Administrative Officer, and Amendment Is Not Discriminatory.

The petitioners, Development Officers in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed writ petitions before the Madras High Court seeking a de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Writ Petitions in Property Dispute, Upholding Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that disputes regarding title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings and that appointment of receiver is a discretionary remedy to preserve property.

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a piece of land in Mumbai. The original plaintiff, Amedmal Bhatewada (since deceased), filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Corruption Case Against Judicial Officer. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Not Required at FIR Stage.

The petitioner, Sharanappa, a judicial officer in the cadre of Senior Civil Judge, was under suspension on allegations of demanding and accepting a br...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal Award Granting Grade Parity to Laboratory Assistants at Research Centre. Historical Parity and Similar Job Functions Justify Equal Classification Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Hindustan Lever Limited and the Hindustan Lever Research Centre Employees' Union challenging an awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award — Time Limit in Consent Order Held Directory, Not Mandatory. Arbitrator's Mandate Did Not Terminate Automatically Upon Expiry of Four-Month Period Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition challenging an arbitral award dated 31.3.2004. The dispute originated from Suit...