Search Results for "mineral development"

337 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 337 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Stone Crusher's Petition Against Closure of Mining Lease Account. Court holds that partnership firm is entitled to continue quarry lease operations under Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 despite change in constitution of firm.

The petitioner, Shiv Stone Crusher, a partnership firm, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Royalty on Run-of-Mine Coal for Period Prior to Insertion of Rule 64B and 64C in Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Processed or Beneficiated Coal Attracts Royalty After Effective Date of Notification Dated 25th September, 2000.

The dispute involved multiple appeals before the Supreme Court arising out of conflicting interpretations of the stage at which royalty becomes payabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand for ₹215.75 Crores for Unlawful Mining of Iron Ore. Petitioner's Mining Lease Renewal Deemed Granted Under Section 8(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Extraction Was Lawful.

The petitioner, M/s Deepchand Kishenlal, a registered partnership firm, held a mining lease originally granted in 1954 for manganese ore and kaolin, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Goa Mineral Policy 2013 and Royalty Levy. Court holds that royalty is a tax under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the State Government has power to levy it.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by mining companies and individuals challenging the Goa Mineral Policy 2013 and the levy of royalt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Suspension of Mining Operations and Investigation into Illegal Mining in Odisha. Lessees Operating Without Statutory Clearances Under Environment and Forest Laws Ordered to Stop Mining, and CEC to List Violators.

These writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution brought to light a massive mining scandal in the Keonjhar, Sundergarh, and Mayurbhanj distri...