Search Results for "market fee"

332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order in Civil Revision Petition Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with CPC Provisions — Petitioner's Application for Temporary Injunction Dismissed Without Proper Consideration of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The petitioner, Sangameshgouda Mudigoudra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgment: 'Ghee' is a Product of Livestock. Market Fee on Ghee Regulated under Andhra Pradesh Markets Act, 1966

The Supreme Court, in this case, addressed whether "ghee" falls under the definition of "products of livestock" under The Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...