Search Results for "mandatory meeting date"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "mandatory meeting date"

1599 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1599 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Meeting Rule. Rule 17 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 Held Mandatory; Failure to Move and Second Motion Vitiates Proceedings.

10 Jan 2013

The dispute arose from a no confidence motion passed against the petitioner, who was the elected Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Minche, Taluka Hatkanangale...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Upholding Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Municipal President. Single Judge Found No Requirement of Personal Service Under Section 47(2) of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.

2 Jan 2013

The writ appeal arose from a dispute regarding the convening of a special meeting of the City Municipal Council, Tumkur, to consider a no-confidence m...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(3) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The notice issued on 27-01-2025 for a meeting on 31-01-2025 provided only 4 days' notice, which is invalid.

17 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Sharda W/o Ramesh N., is the President of Somasamudra Gram Panchayat in Kurugodu Taluk, Ballari District. She filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Subject Committees and Chairman in Municipal Council Due to Non-Compliance with Section 81 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act. Proportional Representation Required for Election of Subject Committee Members.

21 Jan 2011

The petitioner, Vitthal P. Chopade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 18.12.2010 passed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against APMC President for Violating Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(3) of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966. The court held that the notice period of 12 days from 17.10.2013 to 29.10.2013 was invalid as it did not provide the required 15 clear days.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Tharadevi, was the President of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Batawade, Tumkur. On 30.09.2013, 12 elected mem...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Banks to Comply with RBI Prudential Framework for Stressed Assets Resolution in Writ Petition by Borrower Company. Court holds that the Prudential Framework dated June 7, 2019, requires lenders to convene a review meeting within 30 days of default to decide on a resolution plan.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Ganjam Nagappa and Son Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

17 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Grama Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the notice period is mandatory, not directory, and quashed the notice that provided only 7 days instead of the required 15 days.

11 Sep 2019

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging notices for no-confidence mot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Between Direct Recruits and Promotees in District Judge Cadre; Examines Application of 40-Point Roster System under Maharashtra Judicial Services (Seniority) Rules 2007. The vexed issue of seniority between direct recruits and promotees once again engages the Court; the Writ Petition challenges the Final Approved Seniority List dated 11-09-2015.

25 Oct 2018

Background: The case pertains to a writ petition under Article 226 filed by fourteen judicial officers holding various posts in the subordinate judici...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction EGM in Company Dispute. Court Holds That Requisition for EGM Under Section 169 of Companies Act, 1956 Is Valid Despite Pending Oppression Petitions and That Board's Failure to Call Meeting Within 21 Days Entitles Requisitionists to Call Meeting Themselves.

24 Jul 2013

The case involves a dispute between two groups of shareholders in Man Industries (I) Ltd., represented by two brothers, Ramesh Mansukhani (supporting ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)