Search Results for "liquor license shifting"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Cantonment Board and PCMC to Act Against Unauthorised Conversion of Basement Godowns into Bar and Restaurant. Statutory Authorities Cannot Plead Helplessness in Enforcing Law Against Admitted Illegalities.

The Petitioner, a retired Colonel, filed complaints in 2016 to the Cantonment Board, Dehu Road, and the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Explosives License Cancellation and Police Action Against Fireworks Traders. Court Holds That Natural Justice Violation Is Outweighed by Public Safety Concerns Under Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 144 CrPC.

The petitioners, ten firms and individuals engaged in the sale of fireworks and explosives in Sultanpet, Bangalore, challenged the cancellation of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Collector's Order Cancelling Liquor Licence for Violation of Audi Alteram Partem Principle. Cancellation Without Hearing Renders Order Void; Matter Remitted for Fresh Decision After Hearing.

The petitioners, proprietors of hotels and a country liquor shop in Chapadgaon, District Ahmednagar, held valid liquor licenses. The Collector, Ahmedn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tribunal Order in Excise License Dispute — Petitioner's Business Premises Not Within Objectionable Distance. Rule 5 of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 Relaxation Power Must Be Considered Before Directing Shifting of CL-2 Licensee.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviraj Enterprises, a partnership firm holding a CL-2 license under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, was issued a show cause noti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Mandamus Against Excise License Renewal. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi to object to renewal of CL-2 license for wine shop in residential area under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.

The petitioners, eight residents of B. Krishnappa Layout, Vijayanagar, Bangalore, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ...