Search Results for "limited review"

3925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Municipal Demolition Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review petition against dismissal of writ petition challenging demolition of alleged unauthorized construction rejected as review not an appeal.

The review petitioner, Bipin Chandulal Sodha, filed a review petition (Review Petition No. 31 of 2025) seeking review of the judgment dated 19 Decembe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Teacher Selection Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review sought on grounds of marks comparison and subject eligibility but court held that review cannot be used as appeal and no mistake in original judgment was shown.

The original petitioner, Tikeshkumar s/o Udelal Bopche, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) seeking review of an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Application for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review is not an appeal in disguise and that the judgment under review did not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants, who were the original respondents in the main petition, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 1495 Days Delay in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The present review petition was filed by Electronics & Controls Power Systems Private Limited under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Matrimonial Dispute Over Maintenance and Injunction. Court holds that review cannot be used to re-argue the merits of a case when the original order was passed with consent and no error apparent on record exists.

The case involves a review petition filed by John Vergese (the husband) against an order dated 5.11.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Review Petition in SC/ST Land Grant Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition against order in Writ Petition No.7988/2002 dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The case arises from a review petition filed against the order dated 17.06.2013 in Writ Petition No.7988/2002. The original writ petition involved a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Arbitration Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the judgment in Maula Bux v. Union of India was not applicable to the facts of the case.

The case involves two review applications filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Order XLVIII Rule 1(a) and Section 114 of the Code of C...