Search Results for "life insurance business"

660 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 660 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Insurance Nomination Dispute — Nominee Cannot Override Succession Rights Under Hindu Succession Act. Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938 does not confer absolute title on nominee; nominee holds policy benefits as trustee for legal heirs.

The case involves a dispute between the appellant, Smt. Neelavva @ Neelamma, and the respondents, Smt. Chandravva @ Chandrakala @ Hema and her minor s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Rebate Case Due to Non-Satisfaction of Section 15(1) Conditions. Children’s Deferred Endowment Assurance Policy Premium Not Eligible for Rebate as Insurance Not on Assessee’s Own Life Under Income Tax Act, 1922.

The case arose from an income-tax assessment for the year 1960-61, where the assessee, a minor, claimed rebate under Section 15(1) of the Income-tax A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Insurance Nomination Dispute — Mother of Deceased Policyholder Entitled to Insurance Proceeds as Nominee Under Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938. Nominee is a Trustee, Not Beneficial Owner; Suit for Declaration and Injunction by Legal Heirs Not Maintainable.

The appellant, Smt. Yashodha, is the mother and nominee of the deceased policyholder, Sri Rohith S, who died intestate. The respondents, Smt. Rashmi J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Keyman Insurance Premium Deduction Case. Partnership Firm's Premium on Partner's Life Insurance Held Allowable as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Repudiation of Overseas Mediclaim Policy for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition Set Aside. Insurer Failed to Prove That Insured Had Knowledge of Hyperlipidaemia at Time of Proposal.

The appellant, Manmohan Nanda, sought an overseas mediclaim policy from United India Assurance Co. Ltd. to travel to the USA for a family wedding. He ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Petition Challenging Ombudsman Award in Favor of Widow in Housing Loan Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Conditions Not Material to Risk, Ombudsman's Award Upheld.

This case involves a widow, Gauri V. Raut (Respondent No. 2), whose husband, along with her father-in-law and brother-in-law, passed away within a spa...