Search Results for "labour welfare"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "labour welfare"

737 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 737 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition and Allows Employees' Petition in Part in Lock-Out Wages Dispute Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court upheld the Labour Court's direction to pay 12 months lock-out wages to former employees who had left service, but denied the claim for 20 months ex-gratia payment as not based on any existing right.

31 Aug 2012

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 27 October 2005, in an application under Secti...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.

26 Oct 2016

The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Industrial Disputes Case — Labour Court Must Compute Amount Due Under Section 33C(2) Once Existing Right is Established. Failure to compute despite finding entitlement constitutes refusal to exercise jurisdiction.

13 Jan 2010

The petitioners, employees of Model Mills, Nagpur (a unit of National Textile Corporation), filed an application under Section 33C(2) of the Industria...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows SAIL's Appeal in Minimum Wages Case: Contract Labour Not Entitled to Parity with Regular Employees Without Pleading and Proof of Same Work. Claim under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for wages at par with regular employees fails as contract labour did not establish performing same or similar nature of work.

5 Jul 2019

The present appeals arise from proceedings initiated by workers under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, who were employed after the issuance of a prohibiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition, Restores ULP Complaint Dismissed in Default After 19 Years, Deprives Petitioner of Back-Wages for Period of Delay. The court balanced equities by restoring the complaint to allow the petitioner to challenge his dismissal under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, while depriving him of back-wages due to his own delay.

23 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Sambhaji Shankar Vanave, filed a complaint under Item-1 Schedule-IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Milk Union Retrenchment Cases. Retrenchment of Daily Wagers Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

21 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Solapur Zilla Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh, a cooperative milk union, challenged multiple awards passed by the Labour Court, Solapur, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Welfare Fund Cess as Unconstitutional. Levy under Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 held to be a fee for services rendered, not a tax, and validly imposed on establishments including those with contract labour.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Mohan Dhotre, a resident of Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the levy under the Maharashtra La...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows Petition in Industrial Dispute Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Employee. Labour Court's award under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 modified as compensation was inadequate for terminated employees of merged municipality.

9 Jan 2026

The petitioners, three employees of Vejalpur Nagarpalika, were appointed as Rojamdar Employees in 2003 and later worked as Assistant Clerks from 2009....

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that the workmen in a statutory canteen run by a contractor are not entitled to regularisation as employees of the principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 in Writ Petition No. 35453/2003. The appellant in WA No. 1980/2010 is BEML ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Award Directing Permanent Absorption of 2700 Sweepers and Loaders Engaged in Solid Waste Management. The Case Involves Determination Whether Workers Who Performed Essential Statutory Duties for Over 240 Days Are Entitled to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Being Engaged Through Intermediaries.

22 Dec 2016

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation, established under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)