Search Results for "kidnapping"

292 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 292 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping Case Based on Recovery of Abductee and Circumstantial Evidence. Life Sentence Under Sections 364A/368 IPC Confirmed as Testimony of Child Victim and Recovery of Clothes and Toys Corroborate Prosecution Case.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which dismissed the criminal appeals of Harjindra Singh and Dilbag Singh @ Mitthu, uphol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused made a demand for ransom; conviction under Section 365 IPC upheld for abduction.

The appellant, Mehtab Alam Lalai Choudhari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 364-A (kidnappi...