Search Results for "juvenile offender"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "juvenile offender"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR Against School Authorities Accused Under POCSO Act. Court Holds that Statutory Duty to Report Child Sexual Abuse Overrides Institutional Silence and Upholds Investigation for Failure to Report Under Section 21.

2 Jul 2026

The judgment arises from a criminal petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR registe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Juvenile Justice Age Determination Case Due to Unreliable Documents. The Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside juvenile status, finding birth certificate and school leaving certificate procured and unreliable under Rule 12(3)(b) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 and Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

15 Feb 2022

The appeal challenged an order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 30.07.2019, which set aside an order declaring the appellant a juvenile i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in POCSO Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Procedural Irregularities in Treating Juvenile as Adult and Lack of Corroboration. The Court held that the Special Court failed to follow the mandatory procedure under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 before trying the appellant as an adult, and the evidence of the child victim was insufficient to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

25 Jan 2021

The appellant, a 17-year-old boy at the time of the alleged offence, was convicted by the Special Court under the POCSO Act and IPC for attempting to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder Case Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Sole Testimony of Injured Eyewitness Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 304 Part II/34 IPC When Credible and Reliable.

12 Jul 2019

The case pertains to an incident on 18th June, 1995, during a Jagjit Singh night program in Nainital, where the deceased Rajesh Sah intervened when so...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Juvenile in Rape Case Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 — Emphasizes Principle of Presumption of Innocence and Need for Speedy Inquiry. The court held that under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, bail is the rule and jail is the exception for juveniles, and the mere gravity of the offence is not sufficient to deny bail.

22 Feb 2017

The petitioner, a 16-year-old juvenile, was accused of committing rape on a victim girl. The father of the victim lodged a complaint on 22.12.2016 all...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Sole Eyewitness, Being Brother of Deceased, Was Not Credible and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

18 Sep 2014

The case pertains to the murder of one person, for which the appellants (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 read with 149 IPC. Common Object of Assault Proved Despite Acquittal for Robbery Under Section 396 IPC.

28 Jan 2013

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Dhondiram Balu Dhotre, Satish Vithal Dhotre, Ashok Balu Dhotre, and Vitthal Balu Dhotre (original accu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Mother's Custody Petition for Minor Daughters Rescued from Brothel Under PITA. Custody of rescued minor victims under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 vests with Child Welfare Committee for rehabilitation, not with biological mother, to prevent re-exploitation.

17 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Smt. Babita, mother of two minor daughters aged 15 and 16, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging orders of the Judicial Magistrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Mother's Petition for Custody of Minor Rescued from Brothel Under PITA — Custody of Rescued Minor Victims to Remain with Child Welfare Committee for Rehabilitation. The Court held that once a Magistrate sends a rescued minor to the Child Welfare Committee under Section 17(3) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, the Magistrate's jurisdiction ends and further proceedings are governed by the Juvenile Justice Act.

17 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Smt Munni, mother of a minor girl named Mamta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Juvenile Status at Time of Offence — Conviction Set Aside as Appellant Was Below 18 Years on Date of Incident. The Court held that the appellant was a juvenile on the date of the incident and entitled to the benefit of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, and remanded the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board.

31 Mar 2010

The appellant, Pappu Anant Ghayalkar, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Pune in Sessions Case No.158 of 2001 for offences under...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)