Search Results for "island city"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "island city"

138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Demarcation of Dharavi Koliwada Boundaries in Dharavi Redevelopment Project Dispute. The court issued a writ of mandamus to the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to expeditiously determine and finalise the outer boundaries of Dharavi Koliwada, finding inordinate delay in the discharge of official duty.

18 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Dharavi Koli Jamat Trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to call fo...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition by Concessionaire Challenging NOC for Access to Retail Outlet on BOT Highway. Key Legal Question is Whether Concessionaire’s Statutory and Contractual Rights to Control Access Override Highway Administration’s Power to Grant Access Permissions Under Section 8A of National Highways Act, 1956.

24 Oct 2017

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Nandi Highway Developers Ltd (the concessionaire) challenging a no-objection certificate (NOC) dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Petition Challenging Construction of Residential Building and Public Parking Lot under DCR and MRTP Act — Court Examines Legality of Approvals and Concessions Granted by Municipal Commissioner. The Court Considers Whether Circular Restricting Public Parking Lots to Four Floors Overrides Provisions of DCR 33(24) and Implications of Notices under Sections 51 and 53(1) of MRTP Act.

13 May 2013

The Public Interest Litigation petition filed in 2012 before the Bombay High Court challenged the legality of approvals and construction of a 56‑sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land. The court held that the petitioner had no legal right to the land and the demolition order was valid under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

6 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Manish Estates Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order dated 6th October 2010 passed by the Deputy Chief Eng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Permission for Development on Recreational Ground in Public Interest Litigation. Section 47 MRTP Act Appeal Allowed Without Proper Application of Mind and Contrary to Development Plan Reservation.

10 Jun 2011

The judgment arises from a public interest litigation filed by residents living around the Cooperage plot in Mumbai, represented by the Oval Cooperage...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)