Search Results for "investigation defect"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Appasaheb Narayan Jadhav, a Talathi (public servant) in Dafalapur, Sangli, was convicted by the Special Judge, Sangli, for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Complainant's Testimony is Unreliable Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laxman s/o Narayan Kale, a government servant working with Nagpur Improvement Trust, was convicted by the Special Judge for demanding a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Factories Act for Vagueness of Complaint. Complaint Must Contain Specific Allegations Disclosing Offence; Documents Annexed Cannot Cure Defect Under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, the Manager and General Manager of a fertilizer manufacturing company, Zuari Industries Limited, approached the Bombay High Court unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validity of Prosecution Sanctions: Pre-Trial Determination or Trial Issue? A comprehensive analysis of conflicting Apex Court judgments on the timing and significance of challenging prosecution sanctions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The legal debate on whether the validity of a prosecution sanction must be determined before trial or can be contested during the trial. It examines k...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Managing Director and President of Ford India and Car Dealer Directors in Alleged Fraud Case. Sale of Used Car Disguised as New Model Leads to Allegations of Cheating and Forgery, but Court Finds No Involvement of Manufacturer.

The judgment of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dealt with three criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...