Search Results for "inimical terms"

222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for burning deceased with petrol set aside as dying declarations and circumstantial evidence failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Appellant, Madhav Bhairoba Shirfule, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his nephew, Sanjay Nivrattir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Accused's Conduct and Last Seen Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Hari @ Harihar Udaybhanji Waghade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Champatrao Nagose and sen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC, Acquits Co-Accused for Lack of Common Intention. Conviction based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence; acquittal of others due to absence of proof of common object under Section 149 IPC.

The case involves three appeals arising from a single judgment of the trial court. The appellant Ishwar Baliram Hude was convicted under Sections 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Five Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and evidence suffered from material contradictions and improvements.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by five accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeals Filed by 23 Accused Convicted for Murder, Rioting, and Damaging Property Under IPC and Bombay Police Act. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Offences Including Section 302 r/w 149 IPC, Stemming from Inter-Community Political Violence in Village Talaghar.

These four criminal appeals, heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, arise from Sessions Case No.79 of 2004 decided by the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Assault in Axe Attack Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for causing death by axe blows on head and under Section 324 IPC for causing hurt to another person.

The appellant, Balu Sitaram Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Arjun and for causing hurt to Sandeep un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Coal India Service Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Inquiry Held Before Dismissal Based on Self-Declaration. Rule 34(1)(ii) of Coal India Executives Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 Requires Inquiry Before Penalty of Removal.

The petitioner, Shri Sheopurari Singh, was employed as Deputy General Manager (Vigilance) in M-1 Grade at the Vigilance Department of Western Coalfiel...