Search Results for "impermissible recovery"

682 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 682 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition Quashing Recovery from Gratuity in Pay Fixation Error Case. Recovery of Excess Payment Made to Deceased Government Employee Without Notice Violates Natural Justice and Cannot Be Deducted from Death Gratuity.

The petitioner, Jayshri w/o Sanjay Chandode, is the widow of Sanjay Bhagirath Chandode, a government employee who worked as a peon in the office of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Employees Without Hearing. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without opportunity of hearing and at fag-end of service is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, employees of the respondent-Corporation, were promoted and granted stepping up of pay in 1996. In 2012, the Corporation sought to rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application, Rejects Plaint in Co-operative Society Recovery Dispute. Challenge to Attachment and Auction Orders Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Barred by Section 163, Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Kalika Nagri Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, a co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employees Against Recovery Orders in Service Law Case Due to Lack of Hearing and Erroneous Employer Interpretation. Recovery of Excess Payments After Retirement Held Illegal as No Misrepresentation by Employees and Based on Equity Principles to Prevent Hardship.

The dispute involved retired stenographers who had been granted financial benefits in 2017 based on the Shetty Commission recommendations, which were ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Overpayment from Retired Teacher's Terminal Benefits. Overpayment due to wrong pay fixation under Sixth Pay Commission cannot be recovered after retirement, especially when no misrepresentation by employee.

The petitioner, Issak Abbas Hawaldar, was appointed as a Primary Teacher in Panchayat Samiti, Arale, in November 1976 as a Class-IV employee. He retir...