Search Results for "imminent possibility"

169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Imminent Possibility of Release on Bail. Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Cogent Material or Satisfaction That Detenu in Custody Would Be Released on Bail.

The petitioner, Nitin Baban Pawar, challenged an order of detention dated 19th May 2022 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under the Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Municipal Corporation in Solid Waste Project Injunction Case — Environmental Claims Lacked Scientific Evidence. Court Restores Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit, Holding That Civil Courts Cannot Restrain Statutory Projects Based on Unsubstantiated Apprehensions.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had affirmed the decree of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Failure to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention Despite Awareness of Custody Renders Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application — Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Court held that detaining authority failed to demonstrate compelling reasons or imminent possibility of bail, rendering detention order illegal.

The petitioner, Fazal Sikandar Patel, challenged a detention order dated 26.08.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu in Judicial Custody — Failure to Show Imminent Possibility of Bail Renders Order Invalid. Preventive detention cannot be sustained when detenu is already in custody and no cogent material exists to indicate likely release on bail.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Jaidev @ Rajubhai @ J.D. Ramji Mishra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution chall...