Search Results for "immediate employer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "immediate employer"

440 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

7 Jul 2026

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, Holding Both Employer and Manager Jointly Liable for Death of Worker in Explosion at Explosive Godown. The court set aside the Commissioner's award exonerating the employer and directed joint and several liability.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the legal heirs of deceased Maroti Misal against the J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Hotel Employees Terminated Without Notice or Wages Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer's Challenge Dismissed as Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-conditions of Notice and Compensation.

5 Dec 2018

The judgment arises from two cross writ petitions filed by workmen and their employer, Eastern International Hotel, challenging an order dated 06/06/2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals of Manpower Supply Agency Against ESI Contribution Demands — Principal Employer Not Liable When Immediate Employer is Registered and Compliant. The court held that under Sections 40 and 68 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, the principal employer's liability is secondary and arises only upon default by the immediate employer.

4 Apr 2013

The appellant, M/s. Viskaan Associates, a proprietary concern engaged in providing manpower services, was a registered establishment under the Employe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

26 Aug 2010

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Employee Abandoned Service by Taking Up Employment Abroad Without Intimation. Clause 13.4 of Certified Standing Orders Validly Invoked to Terminate Employment for Abandonment of Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3 Aug 2006

The Petitioner, Infomedia India Ltd., engaged the First Respondent as a machine operator at its printing establishment in Mumbai. On 22 June 1992, the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Employer in ESI Contribution Dispute - Contractor's Employees for Construction and Maintenance Not 'Employees' Under Section 2(9) of ESI Act. The court held that work of construction and maintenance of buildings is not incidental to or connected with the manufacturing process of the factory, thus contractor's employees are not covered under the ESI Act.

2 May 2006

The appellant, Bajaj Tempo Limited, a public limited company engaged in manufacturing commercial vehicles, challenged an order dated 26.11.1990 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPF Withdrawal Claims by Retired Employees Despite Delay — Limitation Not Applicable to Claims Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court held that the right to withdraw provident fund is a continuing right and cannot be defeated by the employer's failure to deposit contributions or by delay in filing claims.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired employees, Durgasri Srinivas Kallakuri and Amit Gunvantrai Mehta, against the Employees' Pro...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)