Search Results for "illicit intercourse"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Adultery Under Section 13(1)(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Illicit Relationship Proved Through Circumstantial Evidence and Conduct of Wife.

The appellant, Manikandan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Section 19 of the Family Courts Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Chain of Circumstances and Motive.

The appellant, Ranganatha T., was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga in S.C. No. 15/2015 for the murder of his wife u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Prosecutrix in POCSO Case, Sets Aside Acquittal of Accused for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor. Court holds that consent of a minor is irrelevant and the victim's testimony is credible despite minor inconsistencies.

The case arises from an appeal filed by the prosecutrix (victim) under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366(A) and 344 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Ramesh Irappa Mutyannatti and Channappa Irappa Jamboti, were convicted by the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under IPC and POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Chandkha s/o Ibrahimkha Pathan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hinganghat, in Special (Child) Case 1 of 2017 for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abhang s/o Laximan Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Ratan @ Vishvajit Manoranjan Bose, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 363, 366...