Search Results for "illegal mining penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "illegal mining penalty"

120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Illegal Quarrying Penalty Recovery. Writ of Mandamus issued to consider representation within three months, as non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Jagaber Ali, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court se...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

18 Mar 2026

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice for Royalty on Steatite Extraction in Violation of Affidavit Condition — Petitioner's Use of Mineral for Decorative Blocks Not Proved to Be for Cottage Industry. Affidavit Undertaking Not Incorporated in Lease Deed Cannot Be Enforced as Condition of Lease.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioner, S.K. Suresh, held a quarry lease for steatite (a minor mineral) granted on 10-11-2010 under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Writ Challenging Seizure of Vehicle for Transporting Gitti; Holds Gitti is Minor Mineral Requiring Royalty and Transit Pass under Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 2013. Transportation Without Valid Secondary Transport Pass and GPS Justifies Seizure and Penalty, and Petitioner's Lack of Clean Hands Bars Relief.

28 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a transporter, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, aggrieved by the sei...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

21 Aug 2018

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows PIL Seeking Remedial Measures Against Illegal Sand Mining and Withdraws Environment Clearance for Non-Compliance. Court Directs State to Formulate Comprehensive Policy and GSEIAA to Re-evaluate Clearance Under Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines.

18 Dec 2019

The Federation of Rainbow Warriors, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Hig...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Cancellation of Quarry Permit for Violation of Natural Justice — Mines Supervisor Lacks Jurisdiction to Seize Under Rule 12(2)(a) of Gujarat Mineral Rules, 2017. The court held that cancellation without notice and before 45 days violates Section 21 of MMDR Act, and seizure by Mines Supervisor is without jurisdiction.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Lalit Mohanlal Sharma, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution read with the Mines and Minerals (Devel...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)