Search Results for "guarantor liability"

177 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Guarantee Dispute — Guarantor's Liability Not Discharged by Family Settlement Without Bank's Consent. Family Settlement Between Guarantor and Principal Debtor Does Not Discharge Guarantor Under Section 134 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The petitioner, Narinder Pal Agarwal, was a director and guarantor of Narendra Metal Converters Pvt. Ltd., which had taken loans from Saraswat Coopera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Co-operative Bank Appeal Against Sureties -- Holds Sureties Liable for Original Loan Under Section 133 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Gujarat High Court Order Set Aside in Recovery Dispute

The Supreme Court allowed appeal by Appellant against High Court order that discharged sureties from all liability -- The Court held that under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Encashment in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Fraud or Irretrievable Injustice Must Be Established for Injunction Against Bank Guarantees Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Felguera Gruas India Private Limited (FGIPL), entered into contracts with the first respondent, Tuticorin Coal Terminal Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...