Search Results for "gratuity scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "gratuity scheme"

470 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 470 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Postal Department, Holds Gramin Dak Sewaks Entitled to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Voluntary Resignation Does Not Bar Gratuity as Section 4(1)(b) of the Act Overrides Rule 6(13) of the Gramin Dak Sewak (Conduct & Engagement) Rules, 2011.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from the Punjab & Haryana High Court concerning the entitlement of Gramin Dak Sewaks (GDS) to gratuit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Employees' Appeal in Gratuity Amendment Case, Upholding Prospective Application and Tax Deduction. The Court held that the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2010 applies prospectively from its notified date of 24.5.2010, not retrospectively from 1.1.2007, and that the cut-off date does not create an arbitrary classification as gratuity is a one-time payment distinct from pension.

13 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute involving employees of Coal India Limited challenging the High Court of Jharkhand's order dated 27.7.2016, which decli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Entitlement for Daily Wager Absorbed as Clerk — Continuous Service Counted from Initial Appointment. Municipal Council's contention that daily wage period cannot be counted for gratuity rejected under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

27 Sep 2019

The Municipal Council, Achalpur, filed a writ petition challenging two concurrent judgments: the order dated 26.06.2015 of the Controlling Authority u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Gratuity Dispute — BIFR Scheme Under SICA Overrides Payment of Gratuity Act. The court held that a rehabilitation scheme sanctioned by BIFR under SICA is binding on all employees and the employer's payment of gratuity as per the scheme constitutes a valid discharge of its liability under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

24 Jun 2016

The writ petition was filed by Suryakant Ramchandra Mahadik, an erstwhile employee of Khatau Makanji Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd., challenging an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

14 Feb 2011

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim of Terminated LIC Employee in Fraud Case, But Denies Pay Revision. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4(6) Requires Termination Order for Forfeiture; Employee Not Entitled to Post-Termination Pay Benefits.

12 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Shivaji Kerba Paikrao, was employed with the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) initially as an Assistant and later as a Higher...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Gratuity Payment Despite Departmental Enquiry — Forfeiture of Gratuity Requires Specific Finding of Quantified Loss. Employer Cannot Forfeit Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Without Specific Charge and Finding of Quantified Loss.

29 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Vinod Vinayak Jinturkar, a former employee of the Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation (respondent no.2), filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Forfeiture of Gratuity for Misappropriation by Bank Employee — Wilful Misconduct Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Justifies Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity. The court held that misappropriation of funds by a bank employee constitutes wilful misconduct involving moral turpitude, and the employer is entitled to forfeit the entire gratuity under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

14 Jun 2018

The petitioner, an ex-employee of the respondent bank, was terminated on 6 July 1996 after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Company's Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Award – Modifies Gratuity Scheme and Applies Calcutta Medical Scheme; Bonus Remanded. Dispute Over Medical Benefits and Gratuity for Workmen in Madras Region Resolved by Applying Established Principles from Prior Decisions.

17 Oct 1969

The case originated from an industrial dispute between Remington Rand of India Limited and its workmen in the Madras region over demands for revision ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Working Journalists Act Case Excluding Perquisites from Gratuity Calculation. Ex-Employee's Gratuity Claim Not Barred; Car Allowance, Free Telephone and Newspapers Not Wages Under Section 2(rr) of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955.

2 Apr 1969

The dispute arose out of a claim for gratuity and leave compensation filed by a former special correspondent of Bennett Coleman & Co. (P) Ltd. under t...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)