Search Results for "gratuity provision"

454 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 454 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Maintainability of Gratuity Application Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Dispute Over Quantum of Contractual Gratuity Under Section 4(5) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Falls Within Jurisdiction of Controlling Authority Under Section 7.

The petitioner-employer, Vitesco Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order of the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act-cum-I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Delayed Gratuity Under Section 8 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Employer's Dispute Over Quantum Does Not Justify Withholding Payment Beyond Prescribed Period.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 27/02/2017 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Nagpur, acting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...