Search Results for "goonda"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Unexplained Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Kalavathi, sister of the detenu Iyyappan, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Unexplained delay of 54 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, sister of the detenu Manikandan @ Pambu Mani, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Snapping of Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Without Explanation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Surya, brother of the detenu Karthick, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Newspaper Trust and Editors for Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Sections 499, 500, 109 IPC quashed as complaint failed to disclose how petitioners were responsible for publication of alleged defamatory news item.

The case involves four criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by the petitioners seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Stale Material. Detenu Granted Bail Months Before Detention Order, Conditions Fulfilled, No Breach of Public Order Established.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the preventive detention of the detenu under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction Against Newspaper in Defamation Suit. Court Restrains Publication of Defamatory Articles About Plaintiff and Family Pending Trial, Holding That Per Se Defamatory Statements Without Justification Cannot Be Published.

The plaintiff, Gokulchand Govindlal Sananda, filed Regular Civil Suit No.17 of 2013 seeking damages of Rs.25,00,000 for per se defamatory publications...