Search Results for "garnishee proceedings"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Adverse Remarks and Costs Against Tax Officer in UP VAT Act Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. High Court's Findings on Ex Parte Assessment and Service of Notice Upheld, but Ancillary Strictures and Penalties Set Aside for Lack of Hearing Opportunity.

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by a tax officer challenging adverse observations, remarks, and costs imposed by the High Court of Judicature at A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Bank Guarantee Validity - High Court's Direction to Substitute Bank Guarantee Set Aside as Appellant Complied with Original Order for Scheduled Bank Located in India Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation against Pow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Attachment of Decreetal Amount for Unpaid Legal Fees Under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. Legal Practitioner's Claim for Professional Fees and Expenses Upheld as the Only Property of the Defendant Was the Decreetal Amount in Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioner, a legal practitioner, filed a suit for recovery of unpaid professional fees and expenses amounting to Rs.1,42,975/- against the respon...