Search Results for "fresh hymen tear"

39 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramprasad s/o Fagulal Amdare, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO Act, Nagpur, for offences under Section 6 read with Section 5(n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 of POCSO Act Confirmed as Prosecution Proved Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandip s/o Atmaram Khandekar, was convicted by the Special Court at Warora for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act and IPC — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Child Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Report of Tear in Hymen Establish Offence Under Section 376(1) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Nana @ Dnyneshwar Yerme, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and IPC for kidnapping and raping a four-year-old girl....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case of Deaf and Dumb Girl Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Laxman Narayan Jadhav, was convicted by the 4th Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Buldhana, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of...