Search Results for "fee refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "fee refund"

259 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 259 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

22 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Corpus Fund Levy in Kerala Medical Colleges. Executive Order Cannot Impose Financial Burden Without Legislative Authority Under the Kerala Medical Education Act, 2017.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard cross-appeals arising from a common judgment of the Kerala High Court dated 23.07.2020 concerning the validity of a c...

High Court

High Court Orders Tax Authority to Refund Rs. 10.69 Crores to Petitioner. Court rules in favor of the Petitioner, mandates refund with interest due to improper adjustment of dues.

9 Jul 2024

The case of a tax refund dispute, the Petitioner sought the refund of Rs. 10,69,89,606/- for the year 2011-2012. The Respondents had adjusted this ref...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.

24 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Dispute — Rule 55A of MP Motor Vehicles Rules Valid. State can charge separate fee for reserved registration numbers under Section 41(6) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

26 Aug 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court judgment that had quashed Rule 55A of the Madhya Prad...

High Court

Legal Battle Over Mumbai Plot and Ground-Based Tower. Dispute Centers on License Agreement, Demolition Costs, and Jurisdictional Authority

22 Jul 2024

The case revolves around a dispute between the Plaintiffs and Defendant regarding a leave and license agreement for a 250-square-foot plot in Mumbai. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee in Suit for Annulment of Compromise Decree. Court Fee Refund Granted Under Section 66(2)(a) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 When Compromise Decree Is Set Aside.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioners, L. Dayananda Reddy and Gayathri D., filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Levy of Fee for Late Filing of TDS Returns is Valid. The Court held that the fee under Section 234E is compensatory in nature and not a penalty, and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Feb 2015

The petitioners, a practising Chartered Accountant and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the co...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)