Search Results for "favoritism"

79 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Land Acquisition for Private Companies Due to Lack of Public Purpose and Favoritism. State's Exercise of Eminent Domain Found to be Misused for Allocating Valuable Land to Private Entities Without Legitimate Industrial Development Goals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a writ appeal challenging a single judge's order dated 06.03.2013 in W.P.No.17211/2009. The appeal was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Hostel Transfer Proposal Under Changed Policy. Government Resolution dated 31.10.2014 supersedes earlier policy; no vested right to have proposal considered under old policy.

The petitioner, a registered society running a boys' hostel for backward class students, applied on 18.09.2010 for transfer of a permanently closed bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Notice Against Contractor for Non-Payment of Dues — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice and Hearing Before Blacklisting Renders Administrative Action Illegal Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The petitioner, M/s. Bhagwati Construction, a proprietorship firm, challenged a notice dated 02.11.2021 issued by the Executive Engineer, Bhokar Divis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Sale of Housing Board Site, Upholds Validity of Sale Deed and Rejects Review Petition. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the sale was validly executed by the Karnataka Housing Board in favor of the trust.

The petitioner, Mr. Adinarayanasetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC Petition in Guarantor Recovery Dispute — Industrial Court Order Set Aside for Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Co-guarantor cannot claim protection under MRTU & PULP Act against employer of principal debtor as recovery action is not an unfair labour practice.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Housing Board Allotment Amendment — Classification Based on Income and Land Ownership Upheld as Reasonable Under Article 14. Amendment to Regulation 4 and Regulation 9A of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, not arbitrary.

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of ...